LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

CORNET v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter for reneging on the promise that laid off employees would get the same severance that had previously been offered (at least 2 months base pay, bonuses, 3 months equity vesting, and health care contributions). 

​

BORGHINO v. TWITTER -   This California state court case challenges Twitter for reneging on its promise regarding severance for California employees.

ADLER v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s failure to provide 60 days’ advance notice to many terminated employees.

​

RODRIGUEZ v. TWITTER –  This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through PRO Unlimited.

​

GADALA v. TWITTER - This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through TEKsystems.

STRIFLING v. TWITTER -  This case is a sex discrimination case.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted female employees at a much higher rate than male employees.

​

BORODAENKO v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s discrimination against disabled employees.

​

ZEMAN v. TWITTER - This case is an age discrimination case.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted employees age 50 and over at a higher rate than younger employees. 

​

WEINBERG v. TWITTER - This case includes claims of sex, race, and age discrimination, as well as class claims under the FMLA.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoffs for having impacted protected groups at a much higher rate than other employees.  This case includes a class claim that employees who were taking family or medical leave, or were preparing to do so, were impacted particularly by the layoffs.

WHITE COAT CAPTIONING, LLC v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s refusal to pay overdue invoices to vendors.