LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

CORNET v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter for reneging on the promise that laid off employees would get the same severance that had previously been offered (at least 2 months base pay, bonuses, 3 months equity vesting, and health care contributions). 

STRIFLING v. TWITTER -  This case is a sex discrimination case.  We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted female employees at a much higher rate than male employees.

RODRIGUEZ v. TWITTER –  This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through PRO Unlimited.

​

​

​

BORODAENKO v. TWITTER -  This case challenges Twitter’s discrimination against disabled employees, as well as employees who were taking family or medical leave, or who had planned to take leave soon, and were let go by Twitter...