TWITTER EMPLOYEES: Contact us for information on how to bring a legal claim
We have filed a dozen class action cases, nearly 2,000 arbitrations, and charges with the National Labor Relations Board challenging Twitter's treatment of workers since Elon Musk took over the company.
In addition to the cases we have brought on behalf of former employees, we have filed a case on behalf of current and former employees who did not receive their 2022 bonus as promised. We recently received an important decision in this case denying Twitter’s motion to dismiss the claim.
We are a nationally recognized employee rights firm. We pioneered the technique of bringing mass arbitrations 15 years ago, when companies attempt to block class actions through the use of arbitration agreements.
In our initial action, the court compelled arbitration, meaning that most employees need to sign up for an arbitration if you want to enforce your rights. We believe all employees who were employed at Twitter before Elon Musk bought the company and lost their jobs within a year of his acquisition are entitled to additional severance pay, and many have additional legal claims as well.
Read below about our legal actions against Twitter and reach out to us with any questions.
Severance Pay
CORNET v. TWITTER - This case challenges Twitter for reneging on the promise that laid off employees would get the same severance that had previously been offered (at least 2 months base pay, bonuses, 3 months equity vesting, and health care contributions).
BORGHINO v. TWITTER - This California state court case challenges Twitter for reneging on its promise regarding severance for California employees.
WARN Act Violations
ADLER v. TWITTER - This case challenges Twitter’s failure to provide 60 days’ advance notice to many terminated employees.
RODRIGUEZ v. TWITTER – This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through PRO Unlimited.
GADALA v. TWITTER - This case is filed on behalf of “contractor” employees who were paid through TEKsystems.
Discrimination
STRIFLING v. TWITTER - This case is a sex discrimination case. We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted female employees at a much higher rate than male employees.
BORODAENKO v. TWITTER - This case challenges Twitter’s discrimination against disabled employees.
ZEMAN v. TWITTER - This case is an age discrimination case. We are challenging Twitter’s layoff for having impacted employees age 50 and over at a higher rate than younger employees.
WEINBERG v. TWITTER - This case includes claims of sex, race, and age discrimination, as well as class claims under the FMLA. We are challenging Twitter’s layoffs for having impacted protected groups at a much higher rate than other employees. This case includes a class claim that employees who were taking family or medical leave, or were preparing to do so, were impacted particularly by the layoffs.
FREDERICK-OSBORN v. TWITTER - This case includes claims of sex and age discrimination, challenging Twitter's constructive layoff of female and older workers following the company's initial layoffs after Musk's acquisition of the company, including through the ultimatum given to employees on November 17, 2022.
Unpaid Vendors
WHITE COAT CAPTIONING, LLC v. TWITTER - This case challenges Twitter’s refusal to pay overdue invoices to vendors.
